> And the last line is exactly the command you need to restart only the failing test for quick debugging (which is harder with truth tables/shared examples).
I think rspec has some fancy tech to provide a command that runs just the failure even with the other implementations. It doesn’t use line numbers when they are ambiguous.
Yeah, it is usually in format like `spec_file.rb[1:2:3:1:8]`, but not in this case—and that’s why I love this approach (a simpler/more widespread alternative of shared examples would lead exactly to that).
> And the last line is exactly the command you need to restart only the failing test for quick debugging (which is harder with truth tables/shared examples).
I think rspec has some fancy tech to provide a command that runs just the failure even with the other implementations. It doesn’t use line numbers when they are ambiguous.
Yeah, it is usually in format like `spec_file.rb[1:2:3:1:8]`, but not in this case—and that’s why I love this approach (a simpler/more widespread alternative of shared examples would lead exactly to that).